<p>I've finally completed something I've been wanting to upload for a couple of years but never got around to writing. I've tried to cover as many of the main issues without writing a full-blown writing manual. </p><p>See the Admin Blog for the guide. </p>

<p>If anyone's been trying to peruse some of the Special pages (i.e. Special:ListRedirects) over the past few days, you may have noticed that the pages and others like it weren't caching properly. The issue at least appears to have been fixed now. </p>

<p>I have another source citation template up: the {{epsource|<font color="gray"><i><source></i></font>}} template. This one will take either episode title or episode number (i.e. S1E01) formats. The template is a bit more sophisticated than the other source templates and will spit out the number format for the text with the episode title as the link. This can keep in-text citations (1) shorter and (2) restrained to a single line. </p> <table class="" style="background-color:transparent; color:inherit; width:100%;"><tr><td style="vertical-align: top; width:50%;"> <dl><dt>Input </dt></dl>

{{epsource|S1E01}}

{{epsource|A Seeker is Born}}

</td><td style="vertical-align: top; width:50%;"> <dl><dt>Output </dt></dl>

• Template:Epsource

</td></tr></table>

<p>In the early days of the Huntik Wiki, the card scans were heavily categorized including by character type, deck type, Titan class (when applicable), hero type, … and very likely many more categories. </p><p>As time has gone by, contributors have within the past year or so expanded the TCG section from just a few cards here and there to being a fairly comprehensive database and a whole section of the wiki. (Many thanks again to Quilafa, Seeker11299, and others who have worked on the TCG project). </p><p>However, with this progress, it would also appear that we have outgrown the need to sort the images so thoroughly when the TCG articles do the same. I've begun removing some of these categorizations on the files, leaving topic categorizations (Seeker name, etc.) and source (TCG set and website category when available). </p><p>I've also been redirecting some of the file names to the format of SET ### Card name (excluding Bold Explorer and other such classifications) to standardize the names and to make it be easier to search for and to link to them. I've also remedied a small number of duplicate card scans on some of the more obscure filenames. </p>

<p>Wikia Activity Monitor (WAM) is used to give information on on how a wiki is doing regarding activity and health on a scale of 0 to 100. Only the top 5,000 Wikis are displayed here, and four of the Huntik Wikis appear here! </p><p>For much of this year, Wikia data shows that the English Huntik Wiki has been almost constantly receiving 10,000 or more viewers per day. Those are pretty impressive stats, especially when you consider that Huntik is nowhere as well-known as, say, the DC or Marvel universes. </p><p>The English wiki currently has a score of 90.44 and is ranked at 393. Our peak rank has been 218. Of the entertainment wikis only, we are ranked at 180. </p><p>The Spanish wiki currently has a score of 65.17 and is ranked at 1595. The peak rank has been 1525. Of the entertainment wikis only, it is ranked at 769. This is quite good for a non-English wiki of a lesser-known franchise, especially considering that it has had an active admin for less than a week. </p><p>The Polish wiki currently has a score of 52.22 and is ranked at 2165. The peak rank has been 417. Of the entertainment wikis only, it is ranked at 1045. </p><p>The Italian wiki currently has a score of 48.52 and is ranked at 2349. The peak rank has been 1043. Of the entertainment wikis only, it is ranked at 1142. </p><p>The Dutch wiki currently does not have WAM data. Based upon comparison, it would have a score of 0.00 and is ranked somewhere past 5000. </p>

<p>Due to recent updates to the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), a US Federal Law, Wikia has been required to disable all anonymous editing on the Huntik Wiki. </p>

<p>All threads made under "Series Discussion" have now been split into several different boards: Season 1 Discussion, Season 2 Discussion, Season 3 Discussion (see mandatory read), Titans and Nullifiers, Seekers and Characters, and Spells and Artifacts. </p><p>Any posts about fanon Titans or Powerbonded Titans have been moved to Speculation and Fanon. With the creation of this board, this is the only place where fanon-based discussion will be permitted on the forums. </p>

<p>Lizz, I Love Wolf Titans, LastIrishWolf, and Araknostwin from the original Huntik Forums invite anyone from the old forums to join Lizz's new forum. It includes a Huntik discussion area. If you would please spread the word to any of the other members from Huntik Forums, it would be very helpful. </p><p>The website is http://cartoons-anime.forumotion.com/. It has other shows, but it's still updating quite a bit. There are lots of things we can add. </p>

<p>Hello everybody, </p><p>Yesterday, I found out that the forums of huntik.ws stopped. </p>

<p>Ever had a question about article content but were afraid that your question might not be noticed? That's exactly what this index seeks to prefent from happening! You can leave a message here if you need to ask a question on a talk page, and it will be added to the index. </p> <h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Index"> Index </span></h2> <center> <table class="" style="background-color:transparent; color:inherit; width:100%;"><tr><td style="vertical-align: top; width:50%;"> <table style="width:100%; border-spacing:0px; margin:0px; background: #402D26;" cellpadding="0"><tr><td style="width:50%; border:2px solid khaki; vertical-align:top;"> <table class="" style="background-color:transparent; color:inherit; width:100%;"><tr><td style="vertical-align: top; width:50%;"> <p>Article </p> <hr><p>Bulreguard
Caliban
Forest Queen Diana
King Basilisk building
Overslam
</p> </td><td style="vertical-align: top; width:50%;"> <p>Section </p> <hr><p>→ Users
→ Users
→ Stats
→ Name
→ Users
</p> </td></tr></table></td><td style="width:50%; border:2px solid khaki; vertical-align:top;"> <table class="" style="background-color:transparent; color:inherit; width:100%;"><tr><td style="vertical-align: top; width:50%;"> <p>Article </p> <hr><p>Ring of Arc
The Divine Comedy
Wind
Wind
</p> </td><td style="vertical-align: top; width:50%;"> <p>Section </p> <hr><p>→ Merge?
→ Spell Name
→ "Possible" spells?
→ Unknown Spell
</p> </td></tr></table></td></tr></table></td> </tr></table></center>

<p>Hey Seekers! I've implemented the new Forums lab so we can test this set-up. From what I hear, it might make things a bit easier to work with than the blogs. Basically, feel free to try these forums out for discussion. I'll note a few things about how these will work below. The blogs will still function until / unless there is community consensus. </p><p>Several wikis have already implemented the new forum interface. For those who haven't here are a few points of interest: </p>

• Ability to easily sort topics upon creation
• "Highlight" notifications can be added to alert users to certain discussions
• Ability to quote posts in replies
• Combination of several functional abilities of the old forums, the message wall, and the blogs